<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovedesign</title>
	<link>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/</link>
	<description>The free font blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: RSL</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-699</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-699</guid>
					<description>Some of these fonts use the same filename, in Windows at least. I've always wondered what happens if you rename the file name. Guess I'm going to find out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these fonts use the same filename, in Windows at least. I&#8217;ve always wondered what happens if you rename the file name. Guess I&#8217;m going to find out now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Derek</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-222</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-222</guid>
					<description>These mighty fonts are respectful and efficient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These mighty fonts are respectful and efficient!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: joey</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-220</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-220</guid>
					<description>yeah, i definitely agree.  but at least it's not flash!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i definitely agree.  but at least it&#8217;s not flash!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: codeman38</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-219</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/03/14/2005/lovedesign/#comment-219</guid>
					<description>LoveDesign does indeed have some good fonts, but I wish they used &lt;em&gt;slightly&lt;/em&gt; more distinguishable colors for Japanese and alphabetic fonts on their chart.  I mean, #cc0000 and #cc0066 aren't exactly that far apart...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoveDesign does indeed have some good fonts, but I wish they used <em>slightly</em> more distinguishable colors for Japanese and alphabetic fonts on their chart.  I mean, #cc0000 and #cc0066 aren&#8217;t exactly that far apart&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
