<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Discussion Questions 5</title>
	<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/</link>
	<description>The free font blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: misnomer</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-3376</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-3376</guid>
					<description>as far as im concerned typefaces are everyones domain, to me its a crime to make people pay for a typeface,

In the old days if you where good enough you just copied other peoples typeface, if you liked franklin gothic, you cut it out and used it..

this whole 'pay for font' thing is complete bullshit.

if you have the right font dosent mean youll have the right design.

its hard enough without the right fonts to be a good designer...

i just really hate this idea you should hide away developments in type, that happened almost half a century ago, what about copyright.!!!!! for god sake it only lasts 50 years in my country ..that includes typefaces.

look at a typeface like franklin gothic... my font will make you pay for that..

or even grotesque sans family..those fonts where developed before the turn of the century!!!!!!  when people thought sans was grotesque..and they charge people for that!!!

to me that is just WRONG.....  theres nobody even alive left when that typeface was invented... but people still charge you for it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as im concerned typefaces are everyones domain, to me its a crime to make people pay for a typeface,</p>
<p>In the old days if you where good enough you just copied other peoples typeface, if you liked franklin gothic, you cut it out and used it..</p>
<p>this whole &#8216;pay for font&#8217; thing is complete bullshit.</p>
<p>if you have the right font dosent mean youll have the right design.</p>
<p>its hard enough without the right fonts to be a good designer&#8230;</p>
<p>i just really hate this idea you should hide away developments in type, that happened almost half a century ago, what about copyright.!!!!! for god sake it only lasts 50 years in my country ..that includes typefaces.</p>
<p>look at a typeface like franklin gothic&#8230; my font will make you pay for that..</p>
<p>or even grotesque sans family..those fonts where developed before the turn of the century!!!!!!  when people thought sans was grotesque..and they charge people for that!!!</p>
<p>to me that is just WRONG&#8230;..  theres nobody even alive left when that typeface was invented&#8230; but people still charge you for it..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-494</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-494</guid>
					<description>I don't mean to imply that anyones typefaces aren't worthy of sale or distribution. There are plenty of typefaces on the market that aren't of the highest quality, so to speak (design and/or technically speaking).

However, I do mean to imply that some people are too quick to "want" to see their products being used by others. Sometimes, it might be better to not give away your first font. Or maybe even your tenth. Your later ones will be better. Really. There is a learning curve.

I know that this realization can hurt. But just because we make things, it doesn't mean that they are intrinsically good! I'm flattered, Forrest, that you find my proto-typeface ideas worth mentioning. Ignaz Textura will not be coming out into the world anytime soon, though. Not unless I throw it all away and start over first! (I based the work on a gravestone from 1519… after about a year or so of tweaking, I set the same lines of text that were on my inspirational source. Let's just say that, sadly, the "original" looked way better. sigh… such is life!) I have already started on more promising, perhaps easier projects. There will be other blackletters, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to imply that anyones typefaces aren&#8217;t worthy of sale or distribution. There are plenty of typefaces on the market that aren&#8217;t of the highest quality, so to speak (design and/or technically speaking).</p>
<p>However, I do mean to imply that some people are too quick to &#8220;want&#8221; to see their products being used by others. Sometimes, it might be better to not give away your first font. Or maybe even your tenth. Your later ones will be better. Really. There is a learning curve.</p>
<p>I know that this realization can hurt. But just because we make things, it doesn&#8217;t mean that they are intrinsically good! I&#8217;m flattered, Forrest, that you find my proto-typeface ideas worth mentioning. Ignaz Textura will not be coming out into the world anytime soon, though. Not unless I throw it all away and start over first! (I based the work on a gravestone from 1519… after about a year or so of tweaking, I set the same lines of text that were on my inspirational source. Let&#8217;s just say that, sadly, the &#8220;original&#8221; looked way better. sigh… such is life!) I have already started on more promising, perhaps easier projects. There will be other blackletters, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: forrest</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-492</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-492</guid>
					<description>If Dan's a novice, I'm a... a... petitioner? Probationer? I've seen examples of his work, and he's too modest. Also, Dan, isn't one of your blackletters out and about in the world? Meanwhile, I have no complete designs, and most of my font-design time is spent swearing at recalcitrant Bézier curves. Conjuring up a typeface from scratch is hard work when you have the drafting skills of a three-year-old.

There's a nugget of truth in his argument I'd like to expand upon. I have enough experience in the arts to know that, perverse as it may sound, it's awfully hard to get people to take you seriously if you give away your products or services for free. Even charging a nominal fee makes what you're doing seem more "real" or "professional". The converse of this is that you should never sell something in bad conscience; slapping a price tag on any old random crap you feel like disgorging unto the world isn't going to do your self-esteem, your reputation, or your bank account any favors. This is why I said I wouldn't release a font for free unless I was willing to charge money for it first. Otherwise, Dan is right: your poor little misbegotten bastards will forever be wandering around, getting themselves into trouble and sullying your good name, all because you didn't take the time to raise them right. (It sounds kind of icky and reactionary when I put it that way, though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Dan&#8217;s a novice, I&#8217;m a&#8230; a&#8230; petitioner? Probationer? I&#8217;ve seen examples of his work, and he&#8217;s too modest. Also, Dan, isn&#8217;t one of your blackletters out and about in the world? Meanwhile, I have no complete designs, and most of my font-design time is spent swearing at recalcitrant Bézier curves. Conjuring up a typeface from scratch is hard work when you have the drafting skills of a three-year-old.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a nugget of truth in his argument I&#8217;d like to expand upon. I have enough experience in the arts to know that, perverse as it may sound, it&#8217;s awfully hard to get people to take you seriously if you give away your products or services for free. Even charging a nominal fee makes what you&#8217;re doing seem more &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;professional&#8221;. The converse of this is that you should never sell something in bad conscience; slapping a price tag on any old random crap you feel like disgorging unto the world isn&#8217;t going to do your self-esteem, your reputation, or your bank account any favors. This is why I said I wouldn&#8217;t release a font for free unless I was willing to charge money for it first. Otherwise, Dan is right: your poor little misbegotten bastards will forever be wandering around, getting themselves into trouble and sullying your good name, all because you didn&#8217;t take the time to raise them right. (It sounds kind of icky and reactionary when I put it that way, though.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-489</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-489</guid>
					<description>Argh... triple negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh&#8230; triple negative.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-488</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-488</guid>
					<description>Hrm... it isn't that I don't think my design isn't very good, Dan -- but rather that there are typefaces that I've put a good deal of work into, and others that were an experiment, exercise or whim. 

That said, however, the point about "bastards" is well taken. I wonder if Frutiger was ever bummed when he came across Initiales Phoebus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm&#8230; it isn&#8217;t that I don&#8217;t think my design isn&#8217;t very good, Dan &#8212; but rather that there are typefaces that I&#8217;ve put a good deal of work into, and others that were an experiment, exercise or whim. </p>
<p>That said, however, the point about &#8220;bastards&#8221; is well taken. I wonder if Frutiger was ever bummed when he came across Initiales Phoebus&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-487</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-487</guid>
					<description>Tim to be, your comment to AmyK was just rude…

Otherwise, I have been enjoying this conversation, both here and in its iterations on Typophile. Like Forrest, I am a novice type designer. I have had several people ask me for copies of my fonts. I have only given them to other designers who I know personally.

I would never post one of my fonts online for free, unrestricted download. Many designers who are just starting out do this, because (like Jay pointed out) they don't think that there fonts are very good. The problem is, once you put a font out there on the market, you'll never know what happens to the font. Your name will be "attached" to the font forever. If/when you do later sell commercial fonts, your previous "bastard" children will still be out and about, and the quality of your work will be judged by both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim to be, your comment to AmyK was just rude…</p>
<p>Otherwise, I have been enjoying this conversation, both here and in its iterations on Typophile. Like Forrest, I am a novice type designer. I have had several people ask me for copies of my fonts. I have only given them to other designers who I know personally.</p>
<p>I would never post one of my fonts online for free, unrestricted download. Many designers who are just starting out do this, because (like Jay pointed out) they don&#8217;t think that there fonts are very good. The problem is, once you put a font out there on the market, you&#8217;ll never know what happens to the font. Your name will be &#8220;attached&#8221; to the font forever. If/when you do later sell commercial fonts, your previous &#8220;bastard&#8221; children will still be out and about, and the quality of your work will be judged by both of them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-486</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-486</guid>
					<description>I got into type design about a year and a half ago, and have struggled with the idea of posting my work online. I have decided not to, mainly because I tend to use them for my own design work. At some point, however, I will be sharing these with the world, and the decisions will go like this, I think:

FREE
1.) Crummy quality/limited character sets
2.) Scanned from old type samples without significant reworking/new character generation
3.) Lousy kerning/metrics

UNFREE
1.) A completely original face or family with some merit/value (I'll make that call when the day comes, I suppose)
2.) A significant amount of reworking and original characters added to an existing alphabet. (like if I started a new take on a face, not a straight duplicate with extra characters)

I guess a single weight of a family given away is a good thing... I recently needed 2 more weights of district and bought the package, so it seems Phil is doing something right.

I doubt I would offer an archive, though. It seems the foundries that "rotate" free faces might encourage more visits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got into type design about a year and a half ago, and have struggled with the idea of posting my work online. I have decided not to, mainly because I tend to use them for my own design work. At some point, however, I will be sharing these with the world, and the decisions will go like this, I think:</p>
<p>FREE<br />
1.) Crummy quality/limited character sets<br />
2.) Scanned from old type samples without significant reworking/new character generation<br />
3.) Lousy kerning/metrics</p>
<p>UNFREE<br />
1.) A completely original face or family with some merit/value (I&#8217;ll make that call when the day comes, I suppose)<br />
2.) A significant amount of reworking and original characters added to an existing alphabet. (like if I started a new take on a face, not a straight duplicate with extra characters)</p>
<p>I guess a single weight of a family given away is a good thing&#8230; I recently needed 2 more weights of district and bought the package, so it seems Phil is doing something right.</p>
<p>I doubt I would offer an archive, though. It seems the foundries that &#8220;rotate&#8221; free faces might encourage more visits.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim to be</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-485</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-485</guid>
					<description>AmyK you retarded or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AmyK you retarded or something?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Hicks</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-484</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-484</guid>
					<description>I give a font away for free on my site called 'Hill House', based on Charles Rennie Mackintosh's famous handwriting:

http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/downloads/fonts

The reason its free is simple. Its my first and only font, and as such isn't professionally kerned and bit thrown together!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give a font away for free on my site called &#8216;Hill House&#8217;, based on Charles Rennie Mackintosh&#8217;s famous handwriting:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/downloads/fonts' rel='nofollow'>http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/downloads/fonts</a></p>
<p>The reason its free is simple. Its my first and only font, and as such isn&#8217;t professionally kerned and bit thrown together!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AmyK</title>
		<link>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-483</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 05:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontleech.com/04/22/2005/weekend-discussion-questions-5/#comment-483</guid>
					<description>Hey, I started a similar discussion at Typophile:
http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/69655.html?1114216992
check it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I started a similar discussion at Typophile:<br />
<a href='http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/69655.html?1114216992' rel='nofollow'>http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/69655.html?1114216992</a><br />
check it out!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
